Apsley Pellatt (1735-1796)

53. Meriton Wills – tracing the family, including Hutton, Grose, Read/e and more

In which we use the Wills of Thomas Meriton and his wife Sarah nee Wilkinson to build a picture of their circumstances and family members.  

The tree below is similar to that in post 52.  This time it omits Pellatt descendants, and includes descendants of Sarah [nee Meriton] Pellatt’s siblings, so far as they are known to me.

In this post, I plan just to use the Wills of Thomas Meriton and his wife, Sarah nee Wilkinson, to introduce readers to the various descendants and other relatives of this partnership. This was a prosperous merchant family resident just south of the River Thames in Bermondsey. In later posts we will follow the very varied lives of each of these branches.

Many years ago, when I had the zest for such things, I extracted key points from the two Wills in question. I use these extracts now. First up is Thomas Meriton, who pre-deceased his wife by nearly 20 years

PROB 11\914 28 Jan 1764 Proved 6 November 1765

Thomas Meriton Of the Parish of St Mary Magdalen Bermondsey Ironmonger

To son Bart Meriton one annuity or yearly sum of £25 from the day of death by wife as she sees fit for his support and maintenance for his natural life ‘in full Bar of all his Claims or Demand into any further or other part of my Estate I having sufficient reasons for so doing’

Bart Meriton is a bit of a mystery.  He appears here with this  carefully worded legacy, but I have not found a record of his baptism, which I think would have been around 1738, given that he was apprenticed to a Turner, Thomas Fowell, in 1752.  A Bart Meriton married in Warwickshire in 1766.  Could this have been him?  More in the next post.

To son Henry Meriton all that my Messuage Dwelling House or Tenement with the Warehouse Yard Ground Wharf and Appurtenances thereunto belonging situate lying and being at or near Dockhead in the said parish together with the Lease whereby I hold the same premises for and during the rest of the unexpired term, he paying the Rent and performing the Covenant therein Contained on the Tenant or Lessees part to be paid done and performed

Further to Henry ‘all the ffixtures which shall then be in about or belonging to the said premises together with all my Weights Scales and all other my utensils and Implements which are used and employed in and about my said Trade or Business of an Ironmonger and also such part of my Goods or Stock in Trade as upon a just and true valuation and appraisement to be had and taken shall amount to the full Sum or value of five hundred pounds Sterling’  But if it falls short, Executors should make up the amount in ready money to Henry, and if it shall be more than £500 value, and Henry wants to take some or all of it, he should deliver a Bond or Obligation to the Executrix within three years, and the sum repaid with annual interest of four per cent until it is paid off.

Eldest son Henry Meriton seems to benefit from the whole of Thomas Meriton’s business interests. A n online search for the value of £ 500 from 1765 to the present day yields a result of something over £ 100,000.

To each of four children: Elizabeth Meriton, George Wilkinson Meriton, Esther Meriton, Anne Meriton £500 stock in bank annuities bearing interest at four per cent or five hundred pounds to each of them in money, as Executrix thinks fit when they attain 21 or the daughters marry provided marriage is with approval of Sarah Meriton (wife). Otherwise the Legacies shall not be paid to them my said daughters or to such of them as shall marry contrary to the Approbation and good liking of their said Mother until she or they shall attain their said several full Ages of twenty one years anything aforesaid to the contrary notwithstanding

Legacy to George Wilkinson Meriton shall be fully paid to him when he attains his said age without any deduction or abatement thereout for any sum of Money that may be given to place in forth Apprentice it being my will and mind that the same shall not be accounted as or for part of his said Money

Sarah Meriton shall take the Interest etc of my said four childrens several Legacies for and towards their Board Maintenance Cloathing and Education and bringing up in their several Minorities. If any one of them should die before full age or marriage then the Legacy of that person shall go to wife Sarah Meriton

To my aunt Sarah Smith of Greenwich in Kent one annuity or yearly sum of £5 for her life, paid quarterly

To my son in law Apsley Pellatt and to my daughter Sarah his wife £20 apiece for mourning

To my son in law George Hutton and my daughter Mary his Wife £20 apiece for mourning

To my cousin Thomas ffowell of London Merchant and Sarah his wife £10 apiece for mourning  

To my friend Abraham Harman of Shad Thames in Southwark Scrivener £10 for mourning

Sole Executrix Sarah Meriton and all the rest residue after above legacies plate jewels money stocks rings household furniture and everything else to her to be disposed of at her death of her own free will provided she remains a widow sole and unmarried.  In case she shall marry again then ‘I give and bequeath unto my said Wife Sarah Meriton only one thousand pounds Bank Annuities bearing interest at four per cent or one thousand pounds in Cash which of them my said wife shall think fit to accept and take and all my household goods plate Rings Jewels Linnen Pewter Brass China Ware and all other my household ffurniture whatsoever part of my residuary Estate and all the rest residue and remainder thereof in case of such Intermarriage again of my said Wife I give devise and bequeath order direct and appoint shall be unto and for my seven children Sarah Pellatt Mary Hutton Henry Meriton Elizabeth Meriton George Wilkinson Meriton Esther Meriton and Anne Meriton’ to be divided among them that are living share and share alike

And if my wife should marry again, I constitute my said cousin Thomas ffowell and my ffriend the aforenamed Abraham Harman to be Trustees and Guardians for my younger children during their several Minoritys

28 January 1764. Witnesses Wm Hart and Wm Harman in Shad Thames. Proved in London 6 December 1765 by oath of Sarah Meriton relict of the deceased

Wasn’t he well off?  The premises in Dockhead remained identified as Meriton’s Wharf well into the 19th century.  Note that Bart is not mentioned again, and that Thomas clearly didn’t think his wife Sarah should marry again.  His ‘cousin’ Thomas ffowell is, I surmise, the Turner to whom Bart Meriton was apprenticed in 1752.  We will meet the youngest offspring and their various spouses in the Will of Sarah Meriton (nee Wilkinson) to which we now turn.

Sarah Meriton [nee Wilkinson] Will PROB 11/1112 3 September 1783 Proved 20 January 1784

Sarah Meriton of Mill Street in the Parish of Saint Mary Magdalen Bermondsey in the County of Surrey Widow

First  ‘I forgive and release unto my Son in Law Apsley Pellatt the sum of ffive hundred pounds which he is indebted to me by two Bonds under his name and seal and which said two Bonds I order and direct my Executors  … to deliver up unto the said Apsley Pellatt to be cancelled and made void’

Also bequeath £200 to said Apsley Pellatt to be paid within one month after death

‘I forgive and release unto my son Henry Meriton all Sum and Sums of Money owing by him to me on Bond or otherwise except the Sum of One Thousand and five Hundred pounds lent by me to him and for which he hath executed a Bond and also a Mortgage of the Messuage or Tenement Warehouses Yard Ground Wharf and Appurtenances thereunto belonging situate in Mill Street aforesaid’ and all but this one to be delivered to him and cancelled and made void’

‘I forgive and release unto my son George Wilkinson Meriton £200 owing to me upon his Bond…’ etc as above

‘I also give and bequeath to my son George Wilkinson Meriton the sum of ffive hundred pounds as part of the Mortgage Money which I have on the premises in Mill Street…’

Also give him my great Silver Waiter [?]  Silver Coffee Pot and the Case with the Silver Knives and fforks therein and also the Counterpane of my own work

‘I also give to my Daughter Sarah the wife of the said Apsley Pellatt my best Diamond Ring  the two pictures of my self and my late husband with my Silver punch Bowl

All my other plate I give to my two daughters Hester [aka Esther] the Wife of James Read and Ann the Wife of the Reverend Mr Grose to be divided share and share alike

To three daughters Sarah Hester and Ann my wearing apparel equally divided between them

To Hester Read the Mahogany Chairs the Seats of my daughter Hewit’s work [She was Elizabeth Meriton, 1749-1775, who predeceased her mother]

To Ann my Gold Watch and two Mahogany Chairs, seats of my own work

To Son George Wilkinson the fire screen of my Daughter Hewit’s work

To Apsley Pellatt and his wife Sarah Pellatt twenty pounds

To son Henry Meriton and Deborah his wife Twenty Pounds

To James Read and Hester his Wife Twenty Pounds

To the said Reverend John Grose and Ann Twenty pounds

Ten pounds apiece to son George Wilkinson and Grand Son Thomas Meriton Hewitt [sic]

All other household furniture and Implements, Linen China etc equally divided share and share alike to Hester and Ann and to son George Wilkinson

To Grand daughter Sarah Charlotte Hutton Twenty Pounds for Mourning

To Grandsons Mill, Apsley and Thomas Pellatt Ten pounds apiece for mourning

To Mrs Sarah Buxton and to Mr Suggett and his wife a Mourning Ring each

‘To William Row of Aldermary Church Yard in the City of London Skinbroker and to my son George Wilkinson Meriton all that Messuage or Tenement with the Ground and Appurtenances thereunto belonging situate in Cold Bath Fields in the County of Middlesex and known by the Sign of the Anchor to hold the same unto the said William Row and my said son…’ for the remaining unexpired term on trust for the sole and separate benefit of my daughter Sarah Pellatt during her life …’ so as not to be in any wise subject to the Debts Contraul [sic] or Engagements of the said Apsley Pellatt and after her death the rents and profits etc (if the leases are still continuing)’ should be for son Henry and after him to son George Wilkinson Meriton

In some way payment from the Cold Baths properties is to be made of one hundred pounds apiece to three grandsons Thomas Meriton Hewitt, John Hewitt and Henry Hewitt when they are twenty one

Give and bequeath to William Row and son George Wilkinson Meriton ‘all these my Messuages or Tenements with the appurtenances in Turks Head Yard in the Parish of St John Clerkenwell in the said County of Middlesex to hold for the rest of its term and by and out of the rents and any profits thereof to pay an annuity or yearly sum of twenty pounds to son Henry clear of all deductions and abatements by quarterly payments – into the proper hands of son Henry and not any other person or persons. After the annuity ends, then to use and benefit of two daughters Ann and Hester

All the rest and residue to William Row and George Wilkinson Meriton one moiety to be invested and benefit Hester, after her to any of her children, reverting to her siblings

The other moiety invested and to benefit Ann

Mill St Property mortgaged to Isaac Buxton and his wife – they should have £200 per year plus interest til it is paid off

Executors William Row and George Wilkinson Meriton

Signed 3 September 1783. Probate 20 January 1784

I have not managed to identify William Row, nor have I found further information about Sarah’s property in the Clerkenwell area.  It seems likely it would have derived somehow from her father?  We have already noted that Apsley Pellatt’s ironmongery business was also in the area of St John’s Clerkenwell.  It would appear that the widowed Sarah had managed to retain a genteel lifestyle as her children matured and married.  We will briefly look at their fates in subsequent posts.

51. Thomas Pellatt (1765-1829), Clerk to the Ironmongers

In which we meet Thomas Pellatt (1765-1829), Clerk to the Ironmongers, son of Apsley Pellatt II and Sarah nee Meriton, married to his cousin Elizabeth Meriton and father to Henry Pellatt, who married his cousin Mary Backler, as the diagram below attempts to show. We learn a bit more about the Ironmongers Company and note that the Pellatts showed nonconformist tendencies throughout the late 18th and early 19th centuries, as did many of the Ironmongers.

The diagram above shows two generations in one line, ie Apsley Pellatt II is at the top left, while his son Apsley Pellatt III is at the bottom left and is the brother of Thomas Pellatt, top middle row. Hopefully readers get the gist!

We briefly met Thomas Pellatt in Post 50, noting he had been apprenticed Clerk to William Leeson and admitted free of the Ironmongers by patrimony in 1789. The Articles of Clerkship for his son Henry (see below) show that Thomas was ‘of Ironmongers Hall [by patrimony] in the City of London Gentleman and one of the Attorneys of His Majesty’s Court of Kings Bench Common Pleas and Exchequer at Westminster, and a Solicitor in the High Court of Chancery…’ He was also known to be ‘of Gray’s Inn’ .

He married his cousin Elizabeth Meriton by License at St James Clerkenwell in March 1795. They had four sons, baptised at Fetter Lane Independent Chapel, but for Thomas the future of his marriage and family were bleak. Three of the four sons died in childhood, with the deaths in Peckham of son Apsley Meriton Pellatt in 1803, aged nearly five, and young John (1800-1804), and in Brighton of first son Thomas in 1807, aged 11. He was buried there at the Union Street Meeting House and Ground – in what then was still known as Brighthelmstone. During those traumatic years, Elizabeth nee Meriton Pellatt died in Peckham in September 1804, perhaps in childbirth. This left just son Henry Pellatt, born in 1797 and articled for five years as Clerk to his father in 1815. We have already met him in posts 11 and 29, in which we traced some interesting relationships arising from the marriage and offspring of Henry and my many times great aunt Mary Backler, who had married in Kennington in 1831. I do not propose to investigate Henry any further.

Clerk to the Ironmongers Company: And so to the career and good works of Thomas Pellatt. Perhaps it was because he had precious little family that he seems to have thrown himself into a range of charitable and legalistic roles, primarily by his becoming Clerk to the Ironmongers Company in 1803, shortly before the death of his wife. He remained in this role until 1830, to be succeeded for four years by his son Henry. His name appears in many newspaper notices as signatory, Clerk of the Ironmongers. According to A History of the Ironmongers Company (Elizabeth Glover, 1991), Thomas Pellatt assumed the role of Clerk while the affairs of the Company were in some disarray. In his early years he fulfilled his legalistic and administrative duties efficiently, but according to Glover, ‘despite his excellent early work, Thomas Pellatt was .. to die with his affairs in disorder, and Henry Pellatt, the son who succeeded him for four years, was obliged to call upon his sureties, much to their indignation, for £343.2s.9d. in 1834’ (p. 105).

The Ironmongers were known for their charitable works, and for their Independent church leanings. On news of his death, the Trades’ Free Press on 26 December 1829 reported: ‘Died – a few days since, Thomas Pellatt, Esq., Clerk to the Ironmonger’s Company, Secretary to the Female Penitentiary, and Joint-Secretary of the Protestant Society for the Protection of Religious Liberty. The deceased was an eminently upright man, and a faithful friend to the various religious institutions which adorn and enlighten the country. His sudden death is greatly lamented by all who had the pleasure of his acquaintance.’

Protestant Society for the Protection of Religious Liberty: In 1815, at the time of persecution of Protestants in the South of France, a very long letter in protest appeared in many newspapers around the country, signed by Thomas Pellatt and John Wilks, joint secretaries to the Committee of the above-mentioned Protestant Society, which had met at the New London Tavern, Cheapside on 21 November 1815, The Committee expressed their ‘astonishment and deep regret’ at learning of persecution in Nimes, and stressed their belief that it should be a matter of conscience for all people how they worship God. (See, for instance, Star, London, 30 November 1815)

IN 1825, Pellatt as Secretary to the Protestant Society wrote on their behalf to condemn the many Protestants who were petitioning against a Bill to remove the various disqualifications applying to Roman Catholics, stressing their overall belief that people should be free to worship according to their consciences. (See, for instance, Morning Herald, London, 2 May 1825) Later in the century, Apsley Pellatt IV, MP, would campaign on behalf of Jews.

London Female Penitentiary: The London Female Penitentiary was founded in 1807, and from the beginning, Thomas Pellatt was the ‘Gratuitous Secretary’. In 1817 he underwent a lengthy examination by the Metropolitan Police about the conduct, finances and more of the institution, reported on three days by the Morning Post – on 17, 18 and 23 December 1817. Thomas Pellatt stated the object of the institution was: ‘to afford an asylum to females who, having deviated from the paths of virtue, and who are desirous of being restored by religious instruction and the formation of moral and industrious habits, to a reputable situation in society.’

The word ‘Penitentiary’ derived from the 1779 Penitentiary Act, which focussed on deterrence and reform of miscreants, through religion, solitude and labour. Thus the ‘fallen women’ to whom Pellatt refers (who could have been prostitutes or sex workers, in modern parlance, but also any woman whose virginity was lost outside marriage). According to Pellatt, the people applying for admission were mainly ‘persons who have lived in service, maid servants, orphans, persons who have been left with one parent, and that parent being under the necessity of going out to work, they have been neglected and permitted to rova about the streets and with bad connexions with other females and other causes, have been led astray’. Pellatt reported ‘only some few of applications from the higher ranks’, and that the average age of admission was 17 or 18. One of the greatest causes of ‘this great evil’ was attendance at fairs: ‘We have more cases upon our books of women ruined at these nurseries of vice than of any other; those fairs I mean in the neighbourhood of the metropolis’.

Of the labour in which the women were occupied, Pellatt said: ‘Washing for hire, that is all the business of a laundry, to qualify them for service; making child bed linen and all kinds of needle work; spinning thread and worsted and knitting various articles, and general fancy works.’ The aim was to send women out to employment. But this was not a life of any luxury. The inmates had meat three times a week, on other days, soup, broth or pudding, and on Thursday, bread and cheese only, that being ‘the day on which the house is open for inspection of the public, and the sale of articles manufactured’. As for those leaving, unless dismissed for misconduct, women only left to go to employment after a maximum stay of two years, and there were more applications for servants than the institution could provide.

With the demise of Thomas Pellatt in 1829, it appears that his nephew Apsley Pellatt IV, son of Apsley Pellatt III and Mary Maberly (and brother to our very own Mary Pellatt) took over the role of Secretary. Apsley Pellatt IV was to become the famous glass maker and MP – much more of him later on.

I have tried in this post to give some flavour of the work of Thomas Pellatt, and more generally of the Pellatts as supporters of a range of liberal religious and charitable causes.

In my next post I will try to trace our Meriton line back a bit – it doesn’t go with any certainty beyond the early 19th century, but introduces a prosperous family in Bermondsey, south of the river Thames.

For an interesting piece on the London Female Penitentiary on Pentonville Road, see https://legalhistorymiscellany.com/2024/02/21/betrayed-seduced-trepanned-or-cruelly-driven-into-sin-the-london-female-penitentiary/

48. Apsley Pellatt (1699-1740/1). Apothecary of St Martin in the Fields

In which we acquaint ourselves with the first Apsley Pellatt and his siblings, later noting his residence in London, his marriage to Mary Sheibell (Scheibel) in 1731 and his death in 1740/1, leaving two children and a third on the way.

Apprenticeships.

We have noted that Apsley Pellatt (1699-1740) was the son of William Pellatt (1665-1725) and Grace Newton (1664-1710). Grace died in 1710, and William was to marry for a second time to Mrs Elizabeth Taunton on 14 April 1715. I have found a Will for a William Pellatt of Lewes, Gent, written in 1719 and proved in 1725 by the sole Executrix, wife Elizabeth Pellatt. The Will is so brief as to make one wonder, simply leaving all estate, goods, chattels etc to loving wife Elizabeth. Is this ‘our’ William Pellatt? No mention of any children? It is puzzling. Had all the children been provided for at the time of the second marriage? There is no Will discovered for Grace, nor, for certain, for Elizabeth, although there is a possible one written in 1747 and proved in 1753, citing a son, ‘Thomas Tonton’ and daughter ‘Elizabeth’ as heirs. I have not researched this further.

William and Grace had seven known children, five boys of whom one, Thomas, died age 20, and the oldest, William, was presumably going to be the heir to his father. The three younger boys were put out to apprenticeships as shown in ‘Sussex Apprentices and Masters 1710-1752 ( https://www.sussexrecordsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/Digital_editions/SRS-Vol-28.pdf ), abstracted as follows:

PELLATT, Apsley, son of William P. of Lewes, Suss., esq.,to Francis Goater of Chichester, [Suss.], Apothecary; 7 yrs. from 24 June last’” [1715]; £60 – We consider below his progress to London and what is known of his later life. See https://practitioners.exeter.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/SUSSEX-MEDICS.pdf , p. 101, for information about Francis Goater, a prominent member of Chichester society.

PELLATT, John, son of William P. of Lewis, Suss. to Benjamin Powell of Lond, upholder; C. I. 7 yrs. ;£40; d. 7 inst. [Dec. 1720]; What happened to John? He was alive when his brother Mill wrote his Will in 1764 (see below). But I cannot reliably find him otherwise.

PELLATT, Mill, son of William P. of Lewis, Suss, gent.,to James Coulton of St Saviour’s, Southwark, [Surrey], hosier; C.I., 6yrs. ; £50; d. 9 inst. [May 1717]. Mill Pellatt’s (1702-1764) apprenticeship to James Coulton in 1717 was not to last, as James Coulton died in 1721. It does not seem that there was a London guild of hosiers then or now. I have found no evidence of what Mill did next, until we see his rather extraordinary last Will and Testament dated 14 April 1764 and proved on 30 May 1764. Mill had died and was buried in Brighthelmstone (Brighton), and his Will begins: “Dear Nephew Apsley Pellatt” – addressed to the son of his late brother, the first Apsley Pellatt, the principal person of interest in this post.

he asks Apsley Pellatt to be his sole Executor, and goes on ‘the 2 Lodgings Houses one Mine the other Mary Warners We agreed in the Court the longest liver Should Enjoy all the Goods in both houses I give to your Sister Mary Pellatt such as beding [sic] Linnen Plate China Glasses every thing that was Mine if Mary Warners will buy the goods as they stand if you think proper may sell them her I have a part of two Vessels One Capt Tho. Telson the other Capt Jno Butler those I bequeath to your sister Mary Pellatt the residue of my Effects I bequeath to you my Nephew Apsley Pellatt I have paid all my Debts so that you shall have no Demand on you except my Brother John Pellatt him I owe about a hundred pound I desire to be buried in this tow very private and frugal by daylight I believe you may Manage all this Business without the Charge of Administering this I Sign as my las Will and Testament this fourteenth Day of April One Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty Four Witness my Hand – Mill Pellatt

To Mr. Apsley Pellatt this Will of Mill Pellatt I devise may be given him Apsley Pellatt the 30th Day of May 1764

On that day, Mr Thomas Meriton of the parish of St Mary Magdalen, Bermondsay (the nephew Apsley’s father-in-law. whom we will meet in future posts), Ironmonger, and Mr Apsley Brett of Lewes, Grocer (I think the son of Apsley Brett, Apothecary in Brighton, and apprenticed in 1756 to Will Brett in Lewes, Grocer) swore that they had long known Mill Pellatt and that the handwriting was his, so that Apsley Pellatt could duly prove the Will on that date. A Mary Warner, aged 72, was buried in Brighton on 26 December 1784, shown as from the Almshouse. Any fotrune she acquired from Mill Pellatt seems to have been exhausted.

Of the daughters of William Pellatt and Grace (Newton):

Elizabeth Pellatt (1692-1734) married John Court, who predeceased her. Her Will and three codicils left all her varied property, including The Friars in Lewes, and everything else, to her brother, the above-named Apsley Pellatt (1699-1740/1), subject to a provision by him of a yearly annuity payable to her brother William of £20 for his lifetime. It is not clear why William, the oldest sibling, should need this annuity. Even more unclear is why the Codicils should go into some detail about £500 and many goods, jewelry and other things to be left to her cousin George Nevill Newton (1696-1746), son of William Newton and his wife, Ann, possibly one of the many Paine’s I mentioned in my previous post. George lived in Brighton, as did Elizabeth in her last days, although both were buried in Lewes. Did he have some influence over Elizabeth?

Elizabeth’s sister Philadelphia (1696-1738) appears to have left little trace. She was not mentioned in her sister’s Will.

The first Apsley Pellatt in London: And so we move to our direct ancestor, Apsley Pellatt (1699-1740/1). Apprenticed in 1715 to apothecary Francis Goater in Chichester, we next find him living in central London, and appearing in the parish records of St Martin in the Fields, now a famous landmark opposite the National Gallery, in Trafalgar Square. Indeed, the present church was finished in 1726, replacing an earlier one built by Henry VIII, and so these Pellatt ancestors worshipped and were buried there. (There is no sign of them in the many memorial stones which pave the floors and walls of the present church.)

Once in London, he can be found as Apsley Pellatt, Apothecary, of Leicester Fields (now Leicester Square). The first substantive mention I have found about him concerns his appointment as Apothecary to the Parish of St Martin in the Fields, to succeed his father-in-law John Sheibell who died in 1734. Apsley Pellatt had married Sheibell’s daughter Mary in 1731. The Vestry Minutes of 15 April 1734 record the need for consideration of employing an Apothecary for the Service of the poor of the parish. The matter was referred to successive Vestries, but finally (what happened to the care of the poor in the interim?), on 16 June 1735, it was: ‘Ordered and agreed that Mr Pellatt Apothecary be recommended .. to be .. employed for the service of the Poor of this parish for the remainder of this present year’. (Westminster Archives, WAC F/2006/434). I have found no further mention of him and this role. He died at the tender age of about 41 in March 1740/1. (It is important here to use the old style Julian calendar to show the date, in which the new year (1741) would have started at the end of March, because of the birth of Apsley Pellatt’s third child, William, in summer of 1741. I had long thought this was too long after Apsley’s death in 1740, but realised that the death date of 1740 in fact referred to March 1741 under the new style which would come into force in 1752.)

As noted above, Apsley Pellatt had married Mary Sheibell (Scheibel)(1712-1758) at St Martin-in-the-Fields on 30 September 1731; he was of the parish of St James Westminster, which implies that he had a different residence prior to moving to Leicester Fields. By the time of his death in 1740/1, he and Mary had had three children. First-born was Apsley Pellatt (1735-1798); then Mary (1736-1791), and William (1741- ) (born posthumously).

Apsley Sr’s Will made provision for his very young children. His freeholds, hereditaments etc were left to his wife Mary in trust until his oldest child reached age 21, using the rents and profits for the maintenance and education of the children (including the one ‘in veintre sa mere’). Then the oldest child was to have these monies and make payments to the other offspring of interest and then, on their becoming 21, legacies of £400 each; and also an annual annuity to Mary of £25 per annum. Basically, Apsley the younger was to inherit the various properties in Sussex, including The Friars…but…he was just five years old when his father died. His mother was to re-marry to widower William Webb a year later. She would die in February 1758. We will learn more about her in my next post, when I trace what is known about the Scheibels, after which we will return to ‘Pellatt’ and review what happened to Apsley Pellatt St’s three children.